RHS Science reveals peat-free doesn’t need additional water
New results from RHS trials in commercial settings reveal that peat-free growing media often retain water better than those containing peat, with new insights on irrigation
Extensive data analysis from RHS trials of peat-free and peat-reduced growing media across multiple nurseries, plant groups and growing seasons has shown that peat-free blends do not necessarily need more water than mixes containing peat, and may in fact have better water retention properties.
This is contrary to popular beliefs around the water-holding capacity of peat-free media, with the 2023 RHS Industry Survey citing irrigation management as a primary concern faced by growers during their transition to peat-free.
Addressing these concerns, through developing new growing media technologies and optimised irrigation protocols, has been a key focus for RHS and industry collaborative research.
Now, 18 months of commercial trials, carried out under standard nursery production conditions at four leading UK nurseries and including shrub, herbaceous, alpine and ericaceous plant groups grown in media from six major manufacturers, have brought news on the water-retaining properties of peat-free mixes.
The results from the trials, which were led by RHS Transition to Peat-Free research fellow Dr Raghavendra Prasad, offer new insights for growers on optimising their peat-free irrigation.
What do growers need to know?
Peat-free doesn’t necessarily need more water under standard nursery production
In all six sets of trials, the growers used their ordinary irrigation regimes. None of the trial plants were treated any differently to a normal commercial batch and no adjustments were made for the peat-free media, since these were preliminary trials, gathering baseline data to provide a yardstick for ongoing research into irrigation management.
Analysis of volumetric moisture content (volume of water contained within a medium relative to the medium’s total volume, as a percentage) over time revealed that five out of six peat-free media tested had similar or higher average moisture content than the peat-reduced control media throughout the course of the trial, despite all mixes receiving the same irrigation.
“This indicates that when treated the same as commercial nursery controls, the majority of peat-free mixes tested did not need more water than media containing peat,” says Dr Prasad. “Additionally, all mixes produced equally saleable plants regardless of volumetric moisture content during production.”
Some peat-free media have better water retention than peat-based mixes
“Growing media manufacturers are very aware of grower concerns around irrigation and water retention, so some manufacturers have specifically designed peat-free blends with enhanced water retention to avoid the need for extra inputs by growers,” says Dr Prasad.
A more detailed long-term analysis of moisture retention, indicated by volumetric moisture content (VMC) percentage over time, of a range of mixes under the same irrigation regimes has revealed that some peat-free media in fact have better water retention than the peat-reduced nursery controls – revealed by a VMC that remains consistently higher under the same conditions.
“Though the same growing media will yield slightly different results on different nurseries,” explains Dr Prasad, “what we consider a moist mix is consistent across the board. The patterns in volumetric moisture content remain the same.”
Growers can reduce their water use by improving irrigation efficiency
The commercial trials found that volumetric moisture content during the production cycle did not significantly influence the saleability of the end product. All products were of similar, saleable quality – as judged by nursery staff – regardless of whether moisture content remained at 60% or 40%.
“This means growers may be overwatering, and keeping growing media moister than they need to, owing to the deceptive ‘dry on top’ look of some peat-free media,” says Dr Prasad. “There is a potential opportunity for growers to reduce their water use by better understanding the water retention properties of their individual mix. Irrigation efficiency in these new-generation peat-free mixes also needs to be improved to optimise crop production.”
Better irrigation management will improve nutrition management
When plants are overwatered,
“This is key during the transition to peat-free media, in which poor nutrient retention has also been cited as a concern by growers. This concern can be significantly addressed through a greater understanding of the best irrigation regimes for your specific peat-free blend,” he says. “By optimising irrigation, you are indirectly addressing nutrition management.
“Reducing leaching and ensuring nutrients remain available to plants for longer improves growth efficiency while reducing environmental impact and expense to growers. These results reinforce the potential for peat-free growing media to support sustainable horticultural practices while meeting growers’ operational needs.”
Awareness of water retention differences between mixes can increase success rates during establishment
“Growing media are delivered to the nursery at different levels of moisture content,” says Dr Prasad. “Regardless of their peat status, some arrive moist and some slightly dry. This means that during the early establishment phase, after plugs or liners are potted on, there can be a risk of a high failure rate when moisture content is not monitored after potting.“This means it’s important that there is an intervention after
What next?
The RHS Transition to Peat-free Fellowship will be conducting further research to better understand the varying water-retention properties of peat-free mixes.
The growing media moisture levels seen in the trials (40-60%) can be considered quite moist. Future research will focus on determining the container capacity for peat-free mixes (how much water a growing media can hold while still containing air pockets), and the plants’ permanent wilting points. The aim will be to establish an ideal range of moisture content (VMC) percentages for various peat-free mixes, to help growers maximise the performance of peat-free growing media and improve efficiency of irrigation and nutritional management.
Another programme of trials is also underway to investigate how nutrition regimes can be optimised for peat-free media.
Research background
The RHS Transition to Peat-Free fellowship, working in partnership with eight major UK commercial growers and seven growing media manufacturers, aims to provide UK growers with the science-based, nursery-tested information and results needed to navigate differences and assist growers in successfully moving away from peat.
These results were shared at the RHS annual Peat-Free Horticulture Conference, which brings together horticultural experts, scientists, industry leaders, and policymakers to share insights, research, and practical solutions for transitioning to peat-free.
Trial details
The growing media used in these trials are all commercially available at scale to the industry and sourced from Bulrush Horticulture, ICL, Jiffy, Klasmann Deilmann, Melcourt and Sinclair.All trials were randomised, replicated and carried out in commercial nursery settings. Sensors monitored the volumetric moisture content (%), temperature (°C), and electrical conductivity (EC) of the growing media. Data loggers received measurements every 60 minutes throughout the entire growing period of the crops. The data aimed to monitor the variations in these three properties between nursery control (peat-reduced) and peat-free alternatives, as well as their changes over time during cultivation under standard production conditions.
A breakdown of the trials that contributed to these results is shown below.